I made this blackout after observing my wife teach my kids math out of a workbook that uses techniques that confuse our Elder Millennial brains. Here’s a decent explanation for why Common Core math problems look so weird:
What does a seed look like?
Here is a zine inspired by my friend Steven Tomlinson. (Steven also inspired one of my favorite bits in Steal Like an Artist.) Most of what I learned was from The Book of Seeds. (If you scroll to the end of this post, there’s a PDF you can print out with a video tutorial to make your own!)
Here is a PDF of the zine that’s free to download and print so you can make it into your own booklet:
Here is a video showing how to fold and cut and fold and glue it into a booklet:
Comics and facial recognition
While taking a photo of Kristen Radtke’s wonderful book, Seek You: A Journey Through American Loneliness, I noticed my iPhone camera was trying to recognize some of the faces in the comic.
Humans are programmed to see faces in almost anything. But I got to wondering how realistically drawn a face had to be in a comic strip for the machine to recognize it. So I pulled out one of my comics anthologies and did some tests:
Fascinating what facial recognition picks up… ? pic.twitter.com/vLiPYdPfCc
— Austin Kleon (@austinkleon) September 7, 2021
The funniest and most meta recognition was in this strip of James Kochalka’s American Elf, in which he draws himself realistically:
When it came to Love and Rockets, I expected the machine to recognize Jaime, but not Beto. I was wrong:
Another sampling of cartoonists whose faces got detected, clockwise, from top left: Chris Ware, Adrian Tomine, Daniel Clowes, and, surprisingly, Ben Katchour.
My initial hunch — that the more abstract a face is, the less chance the machine would recognize it — turns out to be generally true, but not completely.
For example: @dribnet on Twitter pointed out that you can create a drawing that looks abstract to humans, but gets picked up by face detectors,” which he’s done here and here:
I don’t have anywhere that I’m going with this, I just thought it was interesting…
Prince and Pessoa’s heteronyms
Reading Duane Tudahl’s books about Prince’s recording sessions, it’s mind-blowing to realize just how much music Prince was making all the time, sometimes recording two to three songs in one day.
Prince had so much music in him that it was impossible for the record company’s machinery to absorb it into the release schedule, so he wrote and recorded music to give to other acts. For these acts, he channeled different parts of his personality, and he adopted many alter egos and pseudonyms, such as: Camille, the sped-up voice you hear on tracks like “If I Was Your Girlfriend”; Jamie Starr, credited with the production of Vanity 6 and The Time; Alexander Nevermind; Christopher; Joey Coco; and more.
In a weird reading convergence, I’m also reading Richard Zenith’s biography of the writer Fernando Pessoa, Pessoa: A Biography. The first section of the book is a “Dramatis Personae,” listing the dozens of fictional authors that Pessoa invented, the most famous of which were Alberto Caeiro, Ricardo Reis, and Álvaro de Campos. Pessoa gave them all “biographies, individualized psychologies, religious and political points of view, and distinctive literary styles.”
Too radically different from him to be considered simple pseudonyms, as if only their names had changed, Pessoa called them “heteronyms,” and in a “Bibliographical Summary” of his works published in 1928 he explained the conceptual distinction: “Pseudonymous works are by the author in his own person, except in the name he signs; heteronymous works are by the author outside his own person. They proceed from a full-fledged individual created by him, like the lines spoken by a character in a drama he might write.”
Applying these definitions, one wonders which of the names in a list of Prince’s dramatis personae are pseudonyms and which are heteronyms, and whether Prince himself knew. (He told Oprah in 1996, “Recent analysis has proved that there’s probably two people inside of me. There’s a Gemini. And we haven’t determined what sex that other person is yet.”)
Why don’t you sing the newspaper?
In Jim Jarmusch’s documentary about the Stooges, Gimme Danger, Iggy Pop makes fun of something Andy Warhol said to him when they were staying at the infamous Tropicana Motel: “He said, ‘Why don’t you do some songs… just sing the newspaper. Just sing what it says in the newspaper.’ I haven’t gotten around to it yet, but that was his idea.”
It’s not terrible advice. It worked out for John Lennon, whose lyrics for The Beatles’ “A Day in the Life” were inspired while reading the January 17th, 1967 edition of the Daily Mail.
And it worked out for Prince in 1986. He was shook up from an earthquake and reading various newspaper stories in the Los Angeles Times in the week before recording his song, “Sign O’ The Times.” As reported by Duane Tudahl in his fabulous book of Prince’s recording sessions:
Many of the stories… included President Reagan’s “Star Wars” antimissile program, the growing AIDS crisis, the investigation of January’s space shuttle explosion, and stories of drug abuse in the inner city were all big news stories. These blended with the Minneapolis Star Tribune and their reporting about a street gang called “The Disciples.”
Of course, there have been many songwriters who get inspiration from the headlines, and even those who write about the newspaper itself. (Getting poetry from the newspaper is a subject that interests me for obvious reasons.)
Here’s one of my favorites: Bill Callahan in Smog’s “The Morning Paper”:
“The morning paper
is on its way
It’s all bad news
on every pageSo roll right over
and go to sleep
The evening sun
will be so sweet”
These songs are like Ezra Pound’s definition of literature: “News that stays news.”
* * *
Related reading: “He could sing the phonebook!”
- ← Newer posts
- 1
- …
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- …
- 618
- Older posts→