Since January, I’ve been making a monthly “tapeover” mixtape made a from a batch of random, pre-recorded, sealed tapes I bought for 99 cents a piece. I wrote more about it and shared the mixes in the latest newsletter.
Defined by negatives
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39d0b/39d0b1ce3233752b5dc258245b810657e3253968" alt=""
I’ve long been inspired by the punk band Wire’s rules of negative self-definition: “No solos; no decoration; when the words run out, it stops; we don’t chorus out; no rocking out; keep it to the point; no Americanisms.”
In How Music Works, David Byrne writes about the early style of the Talking Heads playing CBGBs as a three-piece combo, how “it was less a band than an outline for a band,” and how they, too, defined themselves against the “overwhelming” sense of what had come before:
The only sensible course was to avoid all of it, to strip everything back and see what was left. Some others in that scene had similar ideas. The Ramones didn’t allow guitar solos, for example, but we took reductionism pretty damn far. It was a performance style defined by negatives—no show-offy solos… no rock moves or poses, no pomp or drama, no rock hair, no rock lights (our instructions to club lighting people were “Turn them all on at the beginning and turn them off at the end”), no rehearsed stage patter (I announced the song titles and said “Thank you” and nothing more), and no singing like a black man. The lyrics too were stripped bare. I told myself I would use no clichéd rock phrases, no “Ohh, baby”s or words that I wouldn’t use in daily speech, except ironically, or as a reference to another song.
It was mathematics; when you subtract all that unwanted stuff from something, art or music, what do you have left? Who knows? With the objectionable bits removed, does it then become more “real”? More honest? I don’t think so anymore. I eventually realized that the simple act of getting on stage is in itself artificial, but the dogma provided a place to start. We could at least pretend we had jettisoned our baggage (or other people’s baggage, as we imagined it) and would therefore be forced to come up with something new.
In Jonathan Gould’s “The Origin Story of ‘Stop Making Sense,” he writes about how director Jonathan Demme defined his film of the band by what he wasn’t going to do:
Demme made it clear that he wanted to focus the whole production solely on the band’s performance. Unexceptional as this might sound, it was a departure from the way that rock concerts had previously been presented on film, from Richard Lester’s mock-documentary “A Hard Day’s Night” to Martin Scorsese’s “The Last Waltz,” by dispensing with a “backstory” of the musicians coming and going; the logistics of staging the show; interviews with the band members, promoters, and fans; and the fervent response of the crowd. Instead, Demme proposed to simply film the band onstage, expertly, while avoiding the rhythmic, fast-paced, jump-cut style of editing associated with the music videos being shown on the recently established platform MTV.
In Rob Walker’s recent newsletter, “‘No’ Rules,” he talks about how extreme self-imposed constraints can spur creative leaps and your signature work. (Rob has an assignment he gives to students, “Always/Never,” in which he has his students make a list of 3 things their work must always do, and 3 things their work must never do.) But, Rob says, you are totally within your rights to eventually break your own rules and start subtracting the subtractions.
In fact, it might be crucial to your artistic survival to break your own rules. Jonathan Gould points out that while Jonathan Demme took a minimalist approach, by the time Stop Making Sense came around the Talking Heads had “jettisoned many of the musical and theatrical restrictions they had originally placed on themselves.”
Rob pointed out their amazing Live in Rome concert from 1980 as an example of the great leaps they had already made in just a few years:
You can see the same progression with a band like The White Stripes — at first, they began with their extreme constraints of threes: voice, guitar, drums; red, white, black, etc. Slowly, they broke their own rules, added in other instruments on later albums, expanding their sound. (Their biggest single, “Seven Nation Army,” was radical at the time because they included a bass line! Okay, so it wasn’t actually a bass line, it was Jack White’s guitar tuned down an octave with a whammy pedal, but everybody thought it was a bass, so it seemed like they were breaking their rules…)
I love this idea of subtraction and addition, contraction and expansion, breaking your own rules…
(Thanks to Rob for all this — subscribe to his newsletter and buy The Art of Noticing! Here’s an interview between the two of us.)
Keith Jarrett on music and time
We all need variety sometimes, but when every channel has nothing, shouldn’t we notice?
I came across this 1992 op-ed by pianist Keith Jarrett called “Categories Aplenty, but Where’s the Music?”
Jarrett wrote it in the year after Miles Davis’ death. It’s cranky, and it might make some folks roll their eyes. (Jarrett was notorious for being difficult and “proud to be difficult” — in a 1997 NYTimes profile he was quoted as saying, “There are some ages, I think, that don’t deserve art as much as others. I almost think we live in a time now when that is true.”) But for a 30-year-old piece of writing, it feels state-of-the-art to me in that it still describes the state of the arts today. (Plus, I tend to like cranky musicians. Musicians have to be too nice today!)
“We live in an age in which only results seem to count, not processes,” Jarrett writes. “We need to hear the process of a musician working on himself. We don’t need to hear who is more clever with synthesizers. Our cleverness has created the world we live in…”
Elsewhere, Jarrett has told the story of his first encounter with music as a young kid: banging on the kitchen table with celery sticks. He asks us to “try to imagine the first musician,” who was “not playing for an audience, or a market,” but was “playing out of need, out of his need for the music.”
The original musician was not looking for his image; he was using his voice to learn about the world. He knew the world to be liquid (i.e., not made up of discrete entities). We see the world as ‘bits’ of information, either/or, yes or no, digital. We seem to have no desire to experience time. We trade this experience for the ‘accuracy’ of ‘bits’ of time: it’s either 9:19 or 9:20, never almost 9:20. So we think that time is a straight line and, eventually, that everything has edges. Something stops here, something starts there. But the natural world is essentially circular; our heartbeats are not like a click-track or a drum machine; there are different kinds of time, and we don’t only die when we are dead.
“Life is liquid, not solid; a process, not a result; the present, not the future,” he writes. “Life is a process. We’re losing the concept of ‘becoming,’ because this, too, is circular.”
He quotes a canto by Ezra Pound (“Nothing counts save the quality of the affection”) and paraphrases Emerson’s Self-Reliance:
This is a good place to mention that ‘Do your own thing’ came from Ralph Waldo Emerson, who actually said, ‘Do your thing, and I shall know you.’ In other words, you reveal yourself to others through what you do. Emerson’s statement was not meant to be a kind of carte blanche to follow our shallowest whims: it’s not about life style or fashion or technique or casual choices. His statement contains a warning: I will only recognize you if you have your voice; I will not recognize you otherwise.
The actual line from Emerson is “Do your work, and I shall know you. Do your work, and you shall reinforce yourself.”
(Surely, Emerson read Thessalonians: “Do your own work.”)
Jarrett still plays, btw, but due to chronic fatigue and two strokes, he can now only play with his right hand.
Here’s an interview with Rick Beato from earlier this year:
Related reading: “Tomas Transformer at the piano.”
My college radio show
After my adventure last week of going through a stack of melted 45 singles, I went out and bought a refurbished tape deck. I christened it by listening to 20-year-old tapes of the short-lived radio show I did with my college roommate. If you’d like to travel back to 2003 and hear what we played here’s a 9-hour Spotify playlist:
(We stole the title of the show from Gil Mantera.)
Melted 45s
On her morning walk yesterday Meg found a melted stack of 45RPM singles left on the curb. I couldn’t stand to leave them there, so I walked a couple of tote bags over and carried the stack home.
I didn’t know what the heck I was going to do with them until I decided to just go through the stack as I found it and add the songs to a Spotify playlist in order (and then go back through and add the other sides):
Unbelievably, some of the records survived, and I had fun posting some of the survivors to Instagram. Most exciting to me was a decent copy of Jimi Hendrix’s “Purple Haze”/ “Wind Cries Mary”:
I’ve heard “Purple Haze” a million times, but it sounded new to me on this 45 — I don’t think I’ve ever actually listened to it on vinyl, and the echo on Jimi’s voice sounded like it was coming out of a large tin can. Pretty excellent.
There were many, many casualties. The Beatles and Beach Boys must’ve lived at the top of the heap, so to speak, because they were all warped beyond play. Two of the saddest casualties for me were Otis Redding and the Electric Prunes.
But there were some other survivors! Roy Orbison, Barry White, Sinatra, Stones — I was most excited about “Little Girl” from Syndicate of Sound and Shadows of Knight’s “Gloria” cover. (It was right on the edge, but I love that Dunwich label, so I kept it.)
I don’t know how often I’ll listen to them, but I have enjoyed the Spotify playlist.
I was tempted to knock on the door and talk to the people in the house, but in some ways, I’d rather them be a mystery and think about who they are or might’ve been…
Update: I’ve been going back to some 45s I overlooked and keep finding some playable ones, like this wild Pete Drake track, “Forever” — the single version on the 45 actually isn’t streaming. It’s great!
- ← Newer posts
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- …
- 32
- Older posts→