A little tip: If there’s a museum show you’re interested in, look for a “family guide” or “classroom guide” on the website. They’re often offered as free, downloadable PDFs and have good images and information without museum “artspeak.”
Search Results for: notebook
A pandemic diary
Here is a peek inside the second diary I’ve completed since we went into lockdown in March. It runs from May 2nd to July 2nd, exactly two months long. (That rarely happens!)
If you follow along with this blog, many of these pages will be familiar, but I think it’s interesting to see pieces in their original context. People often ask me of what use is my diary. If you follow the links I’ve included under many of the posts, you can see just how much of this blog comes directly from my daily diary work.
Here is a closer look at this collage, which I made to set the tone.
I spent a good part of spring obsessed with the blossoming of our cactus plants out back.
This collage was the real beginning of my house collages for Meg. The drawing was part of my series of 100 blind self-portraits.
I wrote more about Sam’s piece in the post, “Advice from a Caterpillar,” and here are more Humpty Dumpty collages.
Printmaking… with vegetables!
Every time we make a thing, it’s a tiny triumph.
Another house for Meg. (I made two dozen of these in this notebook.)
And yet another, with thoughts on how important keeping a diary is to me.
Usually I put guardian spirits in the front of my notebook, but this nun (who I gave sunglasses and cool hair) hung out in the back, maybe to egg me on.
Now it’s time to hold a weigh in and start a new notebook.
3 bits of Milton Glaser

Designer Milton Glaser died last Friday on his 91st birthday. In addition to his visual work (check out these album covers!), here are 3 verbal bits of his that have stuck in my brain over the years:
1. “The model for personal growth is antithetical to the model for professional success.”
I have had that line tacked on my wall for years. Glaser, like many great creative people, got clued into the fact that success can mess your creativity up way more than failure, because if you succeed
people will continue to ask you for what you have already done and succeeded at. This is the way to professional accomplishment–you have to demonstrate that you know something unique that you can repeat over and over and over until ultimately you lose interest in it. The consequence of specialization and success is that it hurts you. It hurts you because it basically doesn’t aid in your development.
In order to have a more meaningful and fruitful creative life, you often have to be ready to walk away from your career successes, or find a balance between what people want from you and what you want to chase after.
“I believe that Picasso as a model is the most useful model you can have in terms of your artistic interests,” Glaser said, “because whenever Picasso learned how to do something he abandoned it, and as a result of that, in terms of his development as an artist, the results were extraordinary.”
I quoted the emphasized part of that line in the last chapter of Show Your Work!
2. “My mother convinced me I could do anything. And my father said, ‘Prove it.’”
In a 2003 interview with Chip Kidd, Glaser described the influence of his parents on his work:
In my parents I had the perfect combination—a resistant father and an encouraging mother. My mother convinced me I could do anything. And my father said, “Prove it.” He didn’t think I could make a living. Resistance produces muscularity. And it was the perfect combination because I could use my mother’s belief to overcome my father’s resistance. My father was a kind of a metaphor for the world, because if you can’t overcome a father’s resistance you’re never going to be able to overcome the world’s resistance. It’s much better than having completely supportive parents or completely resistant parents.
I quoted that story in my SXSW interview with Debbie Millman, a student and friend of Glaser’s.
3. “Can you imagine calling someone a creative?”
An aside from his talk, “10 Things I Have Learned”:
[C]reative – I hate that word because it is misused so often. I also hate the fact that it is used as a noun. Can you imagine calling someone a creative? Anyhow…
I liked that so much I stole it for the “Creative is not a noun” section of Keep Going.
RIP. (For even more, check out this thread of advice to his students.)
All good things must begin

“All good things must begin.”
—Octavia Butler, journal entry
Here is the inside cover of one of Octavia E. Butler’s commonplace books, from around 1988. She wrote herself many of these motivational notes, which can found in her archives at The Huntington.
That encouragement was probably essential: Butler faced a lot of challenges. She grew up black and poor in Pasadena, Calif., when legal segregation was dead, but de facto segregation was very much alive… In several interviews Butler said she wrote because she had two choices: write, or die. “If I hadn’t written, I probably would have done something stupid that would have led to my death,” she said cheerfully.

Looking at Butler’s notes I was reminded of the notebooks of another fiction writer, James Salter, who wrote all his novels by hand, but would start his notebooks with advice to himself on the inside flap:
This flap, from his notebook for his 1967 novel A Sport and a Pastime, has advice from André Gide:
Write as if this were your only book, your last book. Into it put everything you were saving—everything precious, every scrap of capital, every penny as it were. Don’t be afraid of being left with nothing.
His notebook from Light Years has the same advice: “SAVE NOTHING.”
“As always, you try to put everything you have in a book,” he said. “That is, don’t save anything for the next one. (The book of his uncollected writings is titled, Don’t Save Anything.)
(These images are from his collection in the Ransom Center.)
I always take comfort in the fact that even the great writers needed to pump themselves up to get to work.
Even if you don’t believe it or feel it 100%, it can be of great help to write down the things you want to be true about your life and work. (If you believe otherwise, why write?)
“Creative work is very hard,” wrote Sidney Lumet, in Making Movies, “and some sort of self-deception is necessary simply in order to start.”
Work and learn in evil days
A snippet from Ralph Waldo Emerson’s journal, which we will return to later:
All of my comfort lately has been found in my work. Cutting and pasting and typing and drawing and cutting and blogging and reading. Feeling grateful for what art can do. How you can disappear into a tiny room and make your own world. How you sit down with a blank page and fill it with your hands and at the end there’s something in the world that wasn’t there before. That simple, basic thing.
I am also grateful that I have a repeatable process of making and sharing work. Every day has been the same for the past three years: I write in my diary, and (almost) every day, I post something to this blog. Something private, and something public. And then every week, I send out a newsletter, and eventually enough days stack up that I can put out another book.
I have written about this process many times on this blog but it bears repeating, because repetition is its subject. And come to think of it, all of the books in my trilogy have this subject as their basic spine that supports them: that it is the daily work that accumulates over time into something substantial. (Someone asked me to distill all of my books into one piece of advice, and, off the top of my head, I said: “Try sitting down in the same place at the same time for the same amount of time every day and see what happens.”)

There’s a really beautiful entry in Anne Truitt’s Daybook (January 24, 1975) where she’s grappling with the idea of “industry” in art. “To work is simply not enough,” she writes, “But we have to act as if it were.” She says artists can control the throttle of how hard they work.
Their development is open-ended. As the pressure of their work demands more and more of them, they can stretch to meet it. They can be open to themselves, and as brave as they can be to see who they are, what their work is teaching them. This is never easy. Every step forward is a new clearing through a thicket of reluctance and habit and natural indolence. And all the while they are at the mercy of events. They may have a crippling accident, or may find themselves yanked into a lifelong responsibility such as the necessity to support themselves and their families. Or a war may wipe out the cultural context on which they depend. Even the most fortunate have to adjust the demands of a personal obsession to the demands of daily life.
Truitt then lists how often she had to make these “tricky” adjustments, navigating her marriage and the raising of her three children in mid-20th century America.
I had formed the habit of working in my studio almost every single day. Rain or shine, eager or dragging my feet, I just plain forced myself to work. This habitual discipline came up under me to support my revved-up schedule. I simply got up every morning and worked straight through the day in one way or another, either in my household or in my studio… If there were fifteen minutes between shopping and carpool, I used them. If I had an hour, or two hours, I rejoiced, but didn’t even waste time feeling happy, just worked.”
How did she do it? With “a stubborn feeling… that you just had to keep on going no matter what, and in the face of not knowing what the results would be.”
As a kind of compliment to the hordes of people abandoning or rethinking their blogs, yesterday my friend Heather Havrilesky tweeted about the Substack newsletter service, and how it can be a place where writers can grow and experiment and supplement their income when the world goes off the rails and the regular gigs aren’t there.
(“Finding a way to experiment while slowly building an audience is invaluable,” she wrote, basically summarizing the gist of Show Your Work! “You don’t have to become the embodiment of self-promoting cyborg shill to make a living. You just have to repeat yourself a little — which, as a writer, is admittedly repellant. But people don’t know who the fuck you are or what you’re doing most of the time. Accept it. It’s gross and it’s also just *necessary* to remind people what you do.”)
That word “regular” is interesting: yesterday I posted a zine about bowels and waste and digestion. An artist needs to stay “regular,” to keep the system going, to keep from the mental constipation that comes from not writing. To have something to write for, something we are accountable to, whether it be a blog or a column or a newsletter, is a great help.
I love my weekly newsletter, but it’s not enough of a deadline to keep me regular. I need daily work. Little daily deadlines.
Ralph Waldo Emerson was really good at writing about days. He even wrote a poem called “Days”:
Daughters of Time, the hypocritic Days,
Muffled and dumb like barefoot dervishes,
And marching single in an endless file,
Bring diadems and fagots in their hands.
To each they offer gifts after his will,
Bread, kingdoms, stars, or sky that holds them all.
I, in my pleached garden, watched the pomp,
Forgot my morning wishes, hastily
Took a few herbs and apples, and the Day
Turned and departed silent. I, too late,
Under her solemn fillet saw the scorn.
He had high hopes for his days. The stakes of the day were high. “He came early to the knowledge that every day is the Day of Creation as well as the Day of Judgment,” writes his biographer, Robert Richardson, in the book, First We Read, Then We Write. You can tell he felt failure a lot, and he had worked through a system for being okay with a day that didn’t feel good. (Larkin: “Where can we live but days?”)
Emerson wrote that you work, each day, off the days you already have behind you:
A man must do the work with the faculty he has now. But that faculty is the accumulation of past days. That which you have done long ago, helps you now. No rival can rival backwards. What you have learned and done, is safe and fruitful. Work and learn in evil days, in barren days, in days of depression and calamity.
Most importantly, I think, is what Emerson wrote about not knowing the value of days until later. “We do not know today whether we are busy or idle,” he wrote. “In times when we thought ourselves indolent, we have afterwards discovered, that much was accomplished, and much was begun in us.”
- ← Newer posts
- 1
- …
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- …
- 42
- Older posts→