“Leonardo, “an unlettered man,” as he described himself, had a difficult relationship with the written word. His knowledge was without equal in all the world, but his ignorance of Latin and grammar prevented him from communicating in writing with the learned men of his time. Certainly he thought he could set down much of his science more clearly in drawings than in words. “O writer, with what letters can you convey the entire figuration with such perfection as drawing gives us here?” he wrote in his notebooks on anatmony. And not just in science but also in philosophy, he was confident he could communicate better by means of painting and drawing. Still he also felt an incessant need to write, to use writing to investigate the world in all its polymorphous manifestations and secrets, and also to give shape to his fantasies, emotions, and rancors–as when he inveighs against men of letters, who were able only to repeat what they had read in the books of others, unlike those who were among the “inventors and interpreters between nature and men.” He therefore wrote more and more. With the passing of the years, he gave up painting and expressed himself through writing and drawing…”
—Italo Calvino on Leonardo da Vinci, “Exactitude,” SIX MEMOS FOR THE NEW MILLENIUM
Search Results for: notebook
DAVID SEDARIS @ THE AKRON CIVIC THEATRE

notes scribbled in the dark
Usually when I visit foreign cities and I’m feeling bewildered, I get the feeling that if I knew a local—if I only knew the inside scoop—then all these hidden treasures would be at my fingertips, and the city would open up and present itself as a sparkling gem of culture and fun.
I didn’t get that feeling in Akron. I got the feeling that what you see is what you get.
We headed down to the Blimp City Saturday night to see David Sedaris at the unique Akron Civic Theatre, which was built in 1929 and “fashioned after a Moorish castle featuring Mediterranean decor, including medieval carvings, authentic European antiques and Italian alabaster sculptures.” It’s one of the only remaining “atmospheric theaters” in the country, with “a twinkling star-lit sky and intermittent clouds moving across the horizon.”

During the preliminary book signing, Sedaris had asked two teenage girls who had driven in from Ann Arbor to introduce him, and he strolled out on stage in a tie, short and thin and looking young for 49.
“I’ve been writing animal stories lately, so I’m going to read one of those.”
He read a story about a ewe and a crow having a suburban mom conversation about child birth. Afterwards, he explained that one of his farmer neighbors in Normandy had told him that sheep have to be born in a barn, because otherwise crows will fly down and pluck out the newborn’s eyes. (You can guess at the story’s ending.)
Meghan guessed in the car that he’d read this week’s piece in the New Yorker, “The Understudy,” about a babysitter’s “brief reign of terror.” I was less than enthusiastic about the possibility, because I’d read the story early that morning and found it pretty mediocre. But I had forgotten Sedaris’s secret weapon: that high voice with the ghost remnants of a lisp. He started in, and the story, mediocre on the page, came to life.
Comedy is all about timing, and Sedaris is a pro at reading: he knows when to pause, when to take a sip of water for comedic effect. Even thought he’s a writer, audio—radio, readings, books on tape—is his medium, and it’s hard not to wonder if he’d be the “closest thing the literary world has to a rock star” if it weren’t for his voice.
He said he’d been asked to give the graduation speech at Princeton this year. “And I’m totally Ivy League struck. I have this belief that people who graduate from Harvard and Yale are simply better than the rest of us.” So he’d decided to take advantage of the 36 cities in 37 days tour and write a little bit of the speech every day and try it out on the audience that night. “When I was at Princeton, things were different,” he read, and the next page and a half centered around a joke about avoiding answering tough questions by asking several variations of the question, “Would you like to sleep with my sister?”
(Outrage is always part of comedy, but the woman behind me, instead of laughing, she let out this sound throughout the night, like “jsssh” or “jeez,” and I couldn’t tell if this was her way of laughing, or if she was TRULY outraged, or had no sense of humor, or what. It was the weirdest thing.)
The last story he read was a future New Yorker piece called “Choke On It.” “I always suggest my own titles,” he said, “but they rarely use them.” He went on to talk about how having work in the New Yorker “never gets old.” “Sometimes I’ll leave it open to the table of contents, and try to trick myself, like, ‘Oh, look there’s my name!’ But I think I’m also hoping my younger self will come in and see it, put down the bong, and go, Whoa!”
He dropped out of language class soon after he moved to France, and began answering everyone with the word “D’accord,” which in French roughly translates to “okay.” The story documented the adventures that ensued after he agreed to pretty much everything anyone said, and ended with him sitting in his underwear in a hospital waiting room.
“I feel unconnected in France,” he said. “And I don’t really mind it.”
Meghan leaned over to me and whispered, “The writer in exile.”
To end the reading, Sedaris read short, hilarious excerpts from his daily diary, and then unexpectedly plugged a short story collection by Jean Thompson called WHO DO YOU LOVE?
“Has anyone read this collection?” Silence. “Well, I love this book, and I have copies outside, so buy one of those instead of my books. The lack of applause at the mentioning of her name tells me that she could use the money.”
It’s been my experience that every reading has a theme that at some point reveals itself. The theme last night was writing. Almost every one of Sedaris’s stories had some meditation on writing, whether it was the kids keeping a log of the babysitter’s crimes in “The Understudy,” or Sedaris counting his blessings that not everyone in the world keeps a pocket notebook like him, in “Choke On It.” Auditory eloquence aside, you can tell what Sedaris really loves is writing.
“Sometimes when I find a passage of writing I really like, I type it out into my diary, hoping that somehow my fingers will memorize the movements of greatness, and I can just zone out and watch TV.”
As he strolled off the stage, I thought, this is our era’s Mark Twain: a gay, former housecleaner from North Carolina. Brilliant.
GRAPHIC FACILITATION
While browsing Drew Dernavich’s website (his woodcut-like comics regularly appear in the New Yorker), I came across a page labelled “Graphic Facilitation.” On this page, Drew has examples of drawings and charts he’s done in real-time, sometimes on foam board, sometimes on white board, to capture the content of lectures, business meetings, and conferences.
Now, I’ve been doing this kind of thing in my notebooks for a while now, but I never knew it had a name, let alone that it’s an emerging field. Check out Peter Durand’s Center for Graphic Facilitation blog. There are registered Graphic Facilitators all around the country that are available for hire to “use visual learning to solve problems.” Here’s how to get started.
GESAMTKUNSTWERK

I don’t care much for opera. And I don’t know much about Richard Wagner, either. But I do know that back in 1849, Wagner was thinking a lot about opera and about art, and how to convey the human experience.
The Ancient Greeks got it all right with tragedy, he thought. A thousand years ago, all the art forms were fused together. Now, we’ve screwed it all up, and music, art, and theater are separated from each other! But Opera…Opera has the potential to fuse them all back together again…
So Dick started scribbling in his notebook, and came up with the essay, “The Art-work of the Future.” In it, he came up with a word, and the word was “gesamtkunstwerk.” (Like most German language, it sounds to me like a sneeze.) The word means something like “Total Artwork” or, “a synthesis of the arts.” Wagner was certain that the future of the arts was the integration of all forms, into something like a Mega-Opera.
Some people think that what Wagner was on to is what we now call multimedia. It’s safe to say that the dude was a little ahead of his time.
Matthew Barney might’ve gotten along with Wagner. I saw his CREMASTER CYCLE exhibit at the Guggenheim museum back when I was a sophomore in college. What Barney had done was make up a bunch of worlds out of sketches and sculpture and film. Some people called it a “gesamtkunstwerk.”
I like Barney because I think the greatest thing that an artist can do is create his own world: a place or geography that resembles the interior of his imagination, and all you have to do is drop in through one of his books or films or photos to get to it.
Yesterday I bought a DVD burner. Today I made a DVD of some home movies I’ve shot over the past couple years. With a DVD, and also with the internet, it’s so easy to fuse all kinds of art: film, literature, comics, music. I thought that maybe my goal shouldn’t be to put out a book at all, where I could only put words or a few drawings, but to put out a DVD or a website. Then you could drop in and see everything.
THE KULESHOV EFFECT

page from an old notebook: more about Kuleshov and the actual movie







